Kaleikoa Kaeo

Now if you were to study the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 2, you'd quickly find in the U.S. Constitution, it specifically dictates that in order for a treaty to exist it is first negotiated via the executive branch through the president and signed and then it is confirmed via the senate.  True history would reveal that in fact the provisional government who became the Republic of Hawaii represented between 3 and 4 thousand quote unquote citizens of the Republic of Hawaii. That's all.

The United States executive branch signs a treaty with the Republic of Hawaii.  They take this treaty and want it to be confirmed in the U.S. Senate in 1897. However, while on the Senate floor a great debate occurred. Representatives of the Hawaiian kingdom, Ka Hui Kalaiaina and Hui Aloha Aina.  Because of the great organizing that happens in Hawaii by these organizations and by Queen Lili'uokalani herself, they gather roughly about 38,000 signatures from the Hawaiian natives at that time who were opposed to this annexation.  Not just opposed but clearly stated that it was fraudulent and that, in fact, there was no legal authority that the Republic of Hawaii had in the Hawaiian islands.  So at the Senate floor this great debate goes on, the Queen's official protest letters are entered, these signatures are also entered and clearly shows that the Hawaiians were virtually all in opposition to this annexation. And really what occurs historically is that annexation fails, there really is no treaty of annexation, in fact for the Hawaiian Islands and I repeat, there is no treaty of annexation. And since that time if you were to study history there is no, I mean there is to this date has never been a treaty signed between the representatives of the Hawaiian kingdom and the United States which transferred not just the jurisdiction but the national lands and also the citizenship of the people, the Hawaiian subjects.

What happens in 1898 is that the supporters who are pro-Annexation... because they cannot pass a treaty though the legal channels, they then pass a resolution through the U.S. Senate and House, through the Congress... and this resolution, again which doesn't have the same effect as a treaty under the U.S. constitution...  the resolution again is just basically a public law passed by both houses and as anyone who studies international law would realize that a country's laws can only effectuate their own territory. So in other words the U.S. Congress laws can only effectuate the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress which is the United States, But in 1898, Hawaii still had not been legally annexed.  So therefore the question remains, how does U.S. law, therefore, work its way into the framework of the Hawaiian kingdom and therefore becomes legal in the Hawaiian kingdom.  And so when we jump to 1959 in the supposed Statehood vote and act in 1959, this fraud is not just maintained but is further perpetuated by the allusion or illusion, I should say, that the annexation that really occurred... it was a legal transfer of jurisdictional lands in 1898, and then in 1959, Hawaii is brought in as the 50th state of Hawaii into the U.S. union. But the question is to remain, if that is the case, what is the legal claim that the United States has over the territory of these islands.

If unable to view quicktime video click here. You will be redirected to fifdififdi.com.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.